House v. NCAA Cap Calculator
Model a revenue-share allocation across your sports and see how it lands against participation by gender. Everything is editable, the arithmetic runs as you type, and nothing you enter leaves this page — no account, nothing stored, nothing sent.
| Sport | Counts toward | Athletes | Allocation | Per athlete | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $142,857 | |||||
| $200,000 | |||||
| $80,000 | |||||
| $14,706 | |||||
| $16,000 | |||||
| $22,222 |
Allocated
$20,500,000
Left to allocate
$0
Athletes counted
212
154 men · 58 women
Proportionality
Women, by participation
27.4%
Women, by allocation
9.8%
Moving $3,608,491 toward women's sports would make the two match.
This compares the share of allocation against the share of participation. That is the conventional Title IX proportionality analysis, and whether it applies to revenue share in this form is genuinely contested and being litigated. Treat the number as a prompt for your compliance counsel, not an answer from one. Sports marked “Neither” are excluded from both sides of the comparison.
The version inside the platform keeps the numbers
This one is a scratchpad — close the tab and it is gone. Inside NIL Innovations the model is tied to your actual roster, saves scenarios you can compare, and puts the proportionality check in front of your compliance officer rather than leaving it on somebody’s screen.
Schedule a demo